After reading Learning Objective 1(and partly into LO2
by accident) in the text book, I think that Jared Diamond’s theory of geographic
luck is accurate. First, before we look at the historical evidence for this
theory, it may help to review what Jared’s theory was. Diamond’s theory of
geographic luck states that the ultimate reason to why some civilizations are
so successful and some aren’t, is not because some races are genetically
superior, but rather, due to how geographically lucky a particular group of
people were. Those groups were lucky because the plants and animals that led to
a successful civilization just happened to thrive in one area, the Middle East.
Now let’s take a look at the evidence that I read in the textbook. In LO1,
I read that the first permanent settlements that actually thrived were
generally located in the Middle East. The key word here is “permanent,” because
in the hunting and gathering life style, you can move to different areas as the
food and resources move, whereas with a permanent settlement, you need the
required resources to be able to handle the climate which you are living in. It
just so happens that these resources include wheat and animals such as pigs,
cattle, camels, etc. What do these species all have in common? They are all
able to be tamed and they can all survive in the Middle East! These lucky
nations are some of the prosperous civilizations that you read about in your
history text book that have influenced our society today. These civilizations
include Mesopotamia, Rome, Greece, Egypt, etc. However, Mesopotamia did not
have as great of an impact on history as Rome or Egypt did because many of
their villages were abandoned due to a major climate change in the area,
causing the failure of crops and other resources that had the climate
requirement.
This essay not only has all the required analytical elements. it is also very well organized. Being able to write in such an organized manner is really going to help you ut down the road, especially on longer papers. Well done, Alex.
ReplyDelete50/50